Repensando la evaluación estandarizada del inglés en la educación superior pública: hacia un marco contextualizado y específico de las disciplinas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58299/edutec.v34i2.464Palabras clave:
educational policy, educational testing, higher education, language instruction, language policyResumen
La evaluación estandarizada del inglés desempeña un papel central en la internacionalización de la educación superior; sin embargo, su capacidad para representar las demandas lingüísticas de distintas disciplinas continúa siendo limitada. Este estudio analiza la relación entre evaluación estandarizada y necesidades lingüísticas disciplinares mediante un estudio de caso cualitativo interpretativo en una universidad pública de México. Participaron 25 estudiantes de licenciatura y 4 docentes de Enfermería, Lingüística Aplicada y Educación Infantil. Los datos se obtuvieron mediante un cuestionario tipo Likert, reflexiones escritas y entrevistas semiestructuradas, y se analizaron descriptiva y temáticamente. Los hallazgos muestran que el inglés se utiliza para acceder al conocimiento disciplinar, mientras que las evaluaciones estandarizadas representan parcialmente prácticas la lectura académica, escritura y comunicación profesional. A partir de ELF, ESP, teoría de la evaluación y política lingüística, se propone el Multilevel Contextualized English Assessment Framework (MCEAF), que articula certificación internacional, diagnóstico institucional y evaluación disciplinar contextualizada.
Referencias
Adriansen, H. K., Juul-Wiese, T., Madsen, L. M., Saarinen, T., Spangler, V., & Waters, J. L. (2023). Emplacing English as lingua franca in international higher education: A spatial perspective on linguistic diversity. Population, Space and Place, 29(2), Article e2619. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2619
Aryadoust, V. (2023). The vexing problem of validity and the future of second language assessment. Language Testing, 40(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322221125204
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford University Press.
Bakogiannis, A., & Papavasiliou, E. (2025). Exploring inclusive teaching practices of English for Academic Purposes (EAP) in higher education (HE): Recommendations for practice. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 76, 101538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101538
Bakogiannis, A., & Papavasiliou, E. (2026). Exploring inclusive teaching practices of English for Academic Purposes (EAP) in higher education (HE): A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Higher Education, 91, 1525–1553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-025-01483-3
Banitz, B. (2022). Language assessment in Mexico: Exploring university language teachers’ backgrounds, practices, and opinions. System, 110, 102898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102898
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2024). Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in Palliative Medicine: A review of published research and introduction to the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines (RTARG). Palliative Medicine, 38(6), 608–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241234800
Caprario, M. (2025). ELF communication strategies: A pedagogical intervention pilot study. TESOL Quarterly, 59(1), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3309
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
Cui, Y., Liu, Y., Yu, H., & Gao, Y. (2022). Developing English teachers’ language assessment literacy in an EAP reform context through test design: A case study. System, 109, 102866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102866
Dai, D. W., Vu, T., Knoch, U., Lim, A. S., Malone, D. T., & Mak, V. (2024). Expanding Kane’s argument-based validity framework: What can validation practices in language assessment offer health professions education? Medical Education, 58(12), 1462–1468. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15452
Devos, N. J., Nizonkiza, D., & Lynch, S. (2024). Developing and validating a post-admission screening-diagnostic assessment procedure to offer language support in diploma programs. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 51–77. https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2024.33259
Dewi, O. T. S., & Slamet, J. (2025). Formative ELF-based assessment of spoken communication via learning management system in a culturally diverse classroom. Discover Education, 4, 516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00970-0
Douglas, D. (2000). Assessing languages for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.
Fan, J., Frost, K., & Jin, Y. (2022). Local English testing in China’s tertiary education: Contexts, policies, and practices. Language Testing, 39(3), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322211070839
Jenkins, J. (2015). Global Englishes: A resource book for students (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Kim, S.-Y., & Suh, Y.-M. (2024). Disciplinary writing in EMI courses: Faculty beliefs and practices in the Korean higher education context. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241270752
Lam, D. M. K., & Gayton, A. M. (2025). ‘6.5 sounds a bit better than 6.0?’: A case for embedding language assessment literacy in university teaching staff professional development. Higher Education Research & Development, 44(4), 976–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2439854
Liu, L. (2024). Exploring the feasibility of incorporating ELFA awareness into the development of EAP pedagogy in a UK pre-sessional course. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 13(2), 233–260. https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2025-2001
Malmqvist, J., Atterström, A., & Swärd, A.-K. (2024). But was it trustworthy? Methodological experiences from a study of a hard-to-reach group of students in need of a flexible research approach. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241234805
Piller, I., & Bodis, A. (2024). Marking and unmarking the (non)native speaker through English language proficiency requirements for university admission. Language in Society, 53(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404522000689
Saeedi, Z., Tajeddin, Z., & Tadayon, F. (2025). Assessment of English as a Lingua Franca and its principles: A research synthesis. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 7(3), 130–152. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.250711
Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a lingua franca. Oxford University Press.
Shirahata, M., & Lahti, M. (2023). Language ideological landscapes for students in university language policies: Inclusion, exclusion, or hierarchy. Current Issues in Language Planning, 24(3), 272–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2022.2088165
Topete, B., García, M., & Rodríguez, M. X. (2025). English as a foreign language in higher education: Case study of a public university in México. Revista Veritas de Difusão Científica, 6(3), 4018–4040. https://doi.org/10.61616/rvdc.v6i3.1139
Vogt, K., Bøhn, H., & Tsagari, D. (2024). Language assessment literacy. Language Teaching, 57(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444824000090
Yang, Z., & Wang, P. (2025). Current status and research trend of English language assessment: A bibliometric analysis. Language Testing in Asia, 15, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-024-00317-w
Yung, K. W.-H., & Fong, N. (2024). Revamping an English for specific academic purposes course for problem-based learning: Reflections from course developers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 69, 101386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101386
Zhang, L., Zheng, Y., & Yang, D. (2026). Exploring Chinese university English teachers’ language assessment literacy: A mixed-method study. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 46(1), 322–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2354684
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 EDUCATECONCIENCIA

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.